Approach & clinical governance
A clinician-led, evidence-aware approach.
KPCIRC’s service design emphasises clear scope, defined review responsibility, documentation and treating-clinician ownership.
Four principles
Clinical context matters
Findings are considered alongside the diagnosis, disease setting, prior treatment, available reports and the question being asked.
Evidence strength matters
A detected alteration or database association is not automatically an actionable treatment option. Evidence and uncertainty are stated clearly.
Collaboration adds perspective
Defined review pathways help clinicians organise complex questions and decide what further evaluation may be useful.
The treating clinician remains central
KPCIRC services support clinical assessment and collaboration; the responsible clinician retains responsibility for patient-specific decisions.
Collaboration principles
Defined responsibilities
Institutional and referral arrangements identify who assesses, reviews, signs, communicates and follows up.
Visible limitations
Reports distinguish established findings, potential associations, unresolved questions and missing information.
Privacy by design
The designated submission process is used, and only the information necessary for the requested service is shared.
Agreed scope
KPCIRC does not assume long-term management unless a separate care arrangement establishes that responsibility.
POAS and MTB governance
For POAS and MTB, the precise intake, reviewer, sign-off and communication workflow is specified on the relevant service page and in the service agreement.
